Does see generally have a comma?Asked by: Daisy Chapman | Last update: 18 June 2021
Score: 4.5/5 (72 votes)
The comma after the “see” IS underlined. The comma after the “e.g.” IS NOT underlined. Signals from common groups are separated by semicolons, not as separate sentences. Group I: no signal; e.g.; accord; see; see also; cf.View full answer
People also ask, How do you use See generally?
Explanation: See generally is used here to indicate that this article provides useful background that the reader can refer to if he or she wants more information on this topic.
Herein, How do you cite see also?. "See also" is used to cite to additional materials and authority that supports a proposition but when other authority has already been cited to using either See or [no signal]. An explanatory parenthetical stating the relevance of the additional material is strongly encouraged.
Just so, What is the difference between see and see also?
If you're unsure of the differences between a see and a see also cross-reference in an index, here's an explanation that may help: See: Refers you from an unused term to a used term. ... In the index, only birds has a page number reference. See also: Refers you to other used terms related to this one.
What does CF cite mean?
"Cf." literally means "compare." The citation will only appear relevant to the reader if it is explained. Consequently, in most cases a parenthetical explanations of the analogy should be included «e.g.».
(short for the Latin: confer/conferatur, both meaning "compare") is used in writing to refer the reader to other material to make a comparison with the topic being discussed. Style guides recommend that cf.
Use “cf.” to contrast; to compare like things, use “see” or “see also.” e.g., “for example,” (abbreviation for exempli gratia) Some studies (e.g., Jenkins & Morgan, 2010; Macmillan, 2009) have supported this conclusion. Others—for example, Chang (2004)—disagreed. Always put a comma after.
In a defining clause, use that. In non-defining clauses, use which. Remember, which is as disposable as a sandwich bag. If you can remove the clause without destroying the meaning of the sentence, the clause is nonessential and you can use which.
BACKGROUND: A general see also reference is a reference made from a heading not to. specific individual headings but to an entire category of headings or subdivisions, frequently. listing one or more individual headings or subdivisions by way of example.
In a string cite, use semicolons to separate authorities. ... Id. is used as the first cite (never a later one) in a string cite when the id. refers to the immediately preceding cite and that cite refers to just one source. Never use id. to refer to an entire string cite.
The rule against using "id." more than 5 consecutive times is usually found in a journal's style guide; it's not a BB rule. Rule 10.9 is about citing cases--not using id. (which is found in rule 4.1). 10.9 is short cite for cases #1 and #2 the question is about the BB.
As an abbreviation, Id. always takes a period (or full stop) in both British and American usage (see usage of the full stop in abbreviations).
Do not italicize “i.e.” or “e.g.” in the text of a document. You should only italicize long Latin phrases or obsolete words or phrases.
In law review main text, case names are italicized. In footnote text, use ordinary roman/plain text for case names in a full citation or for case names in a short citation when both parties are referenced. However, in the short cite format when only one party is referenced, italicize the case name.
In the main text, italicize case names; procedural phrases; and titles of publications (including statutory compilations), speeches, or articles. You also can use italics for emphasis. Revised by Alie Kolbe and Karl Bock.
Even though exempli gratia and id est are both Latin (and therefore italicized), no need to put e.g. or i.e. in italics when they're in abbreviated form. ... E.g. is used to give one or more possible examples.
We also use which to introduce a relative clause when it refers to a whole clause or sentence: She seemed more talkative than usual, which was because she was nervous.
When you are determining whether you should use who or that, keep these simple guidelines in mind: Who is always used to refer to people. That is always used when you are talking about an object. That can also be used when you are talking about a class or type of person, such as a team.
A defining relative clause identifies who or what we are speaking about, whereas a non-defining relative clause just gives us more information about who or what we are speaking about. ... A non-defining relative clause is separated from the main part of the sentence by commas.